INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

All research articles published INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR LEGAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS

[1] Jaynes, T.L. Legal personhood for artificial intelligence: citizenship as the exception to the rule. AI & Soc 35, 343– 354 (2020).

[2] Claudio Novelli, Giorgio Bongiovanni & Giovanni Sartor, A conceptual framework for legal personality and its application to AI, An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought Volume 13, 2022 - Issue 2, Pages 194-219 (2021).

[3] S. K. Stepanov, Deconstruction of the legal personhood of artificial intelligence, DOAJ Vol. 2, no. 2 pp. 14 – 30 (2021).

[4] Chitwandeep Kaur & Shivam Nayyar, Interaction of Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence, Upscale Legal (September 14, 2022), https://upscalelegal.com/interaction-of-intellectual-property-and-artificial-intelligence/.

[5] Peter Archer, AI inventors: can AI own intellectual property rights?, Raconteur (December 10, 2021), https://www.raconteur.net/technology/ai-intellectual-property-rights/.

[8] On correlatives see Wesley N Hohfeld, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’ [1913] Yale Law Journal 16.

[9] A similar point has been raised by Tomasz Pietrzykowski, who recognises an intermediate category of legal entities which he calls nonpersonal subjects of law, in Tomasz Pietrzykowski, ‘The Idea of Non-personal Subjects of Law’ in Visa A. J. Kurki and Tomasz Pietrzykowski (eds), Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn (Springer International Publishing 2017).

[12] Aldo Alvarez-Risco, Shyla Del-Aguila-Arcentale, A Note on Changing Regulation in International Business: The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Artificial Intelligence, The Multiple Dimensions of Institutional Complexity in International Business Research, 4 March 2021.

[14] Ryan N. Phelan, Artificial Intelligence & the Intellectual Property Landscape, Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP, published by Lexology; (September 14, 2019), https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8c2b5986-95bb- 4e8e-9057-e4481bfaa471 .

[16] Stefano Zaccaria, AI-written articles are copyright-protected, rules Chinese court, World Intellectual Property Review (WIPR); (January 10, 2020) https://www.worldipreview.com/news/ai-written-articles-are-copyright- protected-rules-chinese-court-19102).

[17] EPO refuses DABUS patent applications designating a machine inventor, European Patent Office; (December 20, 2019), https://www.epo.org/news-issues/news/2019/20191220.html.

[18] Laura Butler, World first patent applications filed for inventions generated solely by artificial intelligence, University of Surrey; (August 1, 2019), https://www.surrey.ac.uk/news/world-first-patent-applications-filed- inventions-generated-solely-artificial-intelligence.

[19] Rohan Seth, Contemporary and Upcoming Issues In the Field of Intellectual Property Rights, The Peninsula Foundation (September 10, 2020), https://www.thepeninsula.org.in/2020/09/10/contemporary-and-upcoming-issues- in-the-field-of-intellectual-property-rights/.

[20] Colin R. Davies, An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights – Artificial intelligence and intellectual property, Computer Law & Security Review Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 601-619 (2011).

[22] Andres Guadamuz, Artificial intelligence and copyright, Wipo Magazine (October 2017) https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2017/05/article_0003.html.

^{^[2]} Shahram Heshmat Ph.D. - University of Illinois at Springfield

^{^[3]} S. Letwin, The Gentleman in Trollope: Individuality and Moral Conduct 63 (1982).

^{^[4]} J. Lucas ‘My discussion of human nature. The Principles of Politics at 1ff. (1966).

^{^[5]} Complete Works - Plato - John M Cooper (Edited)

^{^[6]} Lord Reid, "The Judge as Law-Maker" (1972) 12 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 22 at pp, 28-2

^{^[7]} The distinction between a legitimate development of the law and an objectionable departure from settled principle may of course provoke sharp differences of opinion: see Kleinwort Benson Ltd v. Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 A.C

^{^[9]} Day v. Slaughter, Prec Ch. 16 (1690); Fursakar v. Robinson, Prec. Ch. 475 (1717); Chaman v. Gibson, 3 Bros. C-C 229 (1791). For details see, Roscoe Pound, Law and Morals 31-9

^{^[10]} public; Boswell, Life of Johnson II, 258 (Croker ed. 1859)

^{^[11]} The Conception of Morality in Jurisprudence - T. W. Taylor, Jr. - The Philosophical Review, Jan. 1896, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Jan. 1896), pp. 36-5

^{^[12]} Harrison, " English School of Jurisprudence." Fort. Rev., vol. XXX, p. 488.

^{^[13]} HLA Hart, The Concept of Law, Revised edition, Oxford University Press Publications, 2002 at p. 185-200

^{^[14]} HLA Hart, The Concept of Law, Revised edition, Oxford University Press Publications, 2002 at p. 219-223

^{^[15]} Lon Fuller, The Morality of Law (Yale University Press c 1964) 33 – 91

^{^[16]} Benjamin C Zipursky, „Practical Positivism versus Practical Perfectionism: The Hart Fuller Debate at fifty?, [2008] Vol 83, New York University Law Review at p.1170- 1212

^{^[18]} Stephanie Patron, “The Inner morality of law- An analysis of Lon L Fuller’s Theory?, [2014], Glasgow University Law Society Law Review

^{^[19]} Steven Shavell, „ Law versus morality as regulators of conduct?, [2002] Vol 4, no. 2, American Journal and Economics review at p. 227-257

[1] Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, (1973) 4 SCC 225.

[3] K Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

[4] Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala, (2018) 5 SCC 725.

[1] Oscar Schachter, The Emergence of International Environmental Law, 44 Journal of International Affairs , 457–493 (1991), https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357318.

[5] Trail smelter case (United States, Canada), 3 UNRIAA, p. 1905, 1952

[6] Alan E. Boyle et al., Birnie, Boyle & Redgwell's international law and the environment (Oxford University Press) (2021).

[7] Alan E. Boyle et al., Birnie, Boyle & Redgwell's international law and the environment (Oxford University Press) (2021).

[8] Lake Lanoux Arbitration (France v. Spain) (1957), R.S.A., Vol. 12, 405.

[9] Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, ICJ Rep. (1992) p. 240.

[12] ILC Report (2001) Document A/56/10, p. 388 para. 4.

[13] Philippe Sands et al., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge University Press) (2019).

[14] Malgosia Fitzmaurice et al., Research Handbook on international environmental law (Edward Elgar) (2021).

[15] Patricia W. Birnie et al., International law and the environment (Oxford University Press) (2009).

[17] Trail smelter case (United States, Canada), 3 UNRIAA, p. 1905, 1952.

[18] Lake Lanoux Arbitration (France v. Spain) (1957), R.S.A., Vol. 12, 405.

[19] Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, ICJ Rep. (1992) p. 240.

[20] Gab?íkovo-Nagymaros, Hungary’s Memorial, p. 318.

[21] Aerial Herbicide Spraying (Ecuador v. Colombia), Application instituting proceedings, para 3.

[22] Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, Argentina v Uruguay, Order, Provisional Measures, ICJ GL No 135, [2006] ICJ Rep 113, (2006) 45 ILM 1025, ICGJ 2 (ICJ 2006), 13th July 2006, United Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ].

[23] ILC Rep. (2001) Document A/56/10, p. 388 para. 4.

[24] R. Lefeber, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the origin of State liability (Kluwer Law International) (1996).

[27] R. Lefeber, Transboundary Environmental Interference and the origin of State liability (Kluwer Law International) (1996), pp. 87-89.

[28] ILC Rep. (2001) Document A/56/10, p. 388 para. 4.

[29] Trail smelter case (United States, Canada), 3 UNRIAA, p. 1905, 1952.

[30] Remus Pr?v?lie, Nuclear weapons tests and environmental consequences: A global perspective, 43 AMBIO , 729–744 (2014).

[31] Nuclear Tests, Australia v France, Judgment on Admissibility, [1974] ICJ Rep 253, ICGJ 133 (ICJ 1974), 20th December 1974, United Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ],

[32] ILC Rep. (2001) Document A/56/10, p. 390 para. 3.

[33] Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, para. 29.

[35] Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, Argentina v Uruguay, Order, Provisional Measures, ICJ GL No 135, [2006] ICJ Rep 113, (2006) 45 ILM 1025, ICGJ 2 (ICJ 2006), 13th July 2006, United Nations [UN]; International Court of Justice [ICJ].

[36] ILC Rep. (2001) Document A/56/10, p. 377 para. 2.

[37] Alexandre Charles Kiss & Dinah Shelton, Guide to international environmental law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers) (2007).

[38] Christina Voigt, State responsibility for damages associated with climate change, Research Handbook on Climate Change Law and Loss & Damage , 166–183 (2021).

[39] Trail smelter case (United States, Canada), 3 UNRIAA, 1952.

[40] ILC Rep. (2001) Document A/56/10, p. 399 para. 2.

[42] Richard S.J Tol & Roda Verheyen, State responsibility and compensation for climate change damages—a legal and Economic Assessment, 32 Energy Policy , 1109–1130 (2004).

[43] Christina Voigt, State responsibility for damages associated with climate change, Research Handbook on Climate Change Law and Loss & Damage , 166–183 (2021).

[44] Roda Verheyen, Climate change damage and international law: Prevention duties and state responsibility (Nijhoff) (2005).

[45] See the 1971 Convention Relating tsandso Civil Liability in the Field of Maritime Carriage of Nuclear Material and the 1969 Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage.

[46] Philippe Sands et al., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge University Press) (2019).

[47] Report of the International Law Commission on the work of its fifty-third session United Nations - Office of Legal Affairs, https://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/reports/a_56_10.pdf (last visited Apr 22, 2023).

[48] Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom v. Albania); Assessment of Compensation, 15 XII 49, International Court of Justice (ICJ), 15 December 1949

[1] Student, Third Year, BA, LLB (Hons.), School of Law, CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore.

[2] What is genetic modification (GM) of crops and how is it done?, The Royal Society (May, 2016), https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/gm-plants/what-is-gm-and-how-is-it-done/ accessed Oct. 5, 2022.

[3] David. J. Schiner, Genetically modified organisms and the Cartagena Protocol 379 (Fordham Enytl. L.J., 2001).

[4] David. J. Schiner, Genetically modified organisms and the Cartagena Protocol 394 (Fordham Enytl. L.J., 2001).

[5] A. A. Snow et al., Genetically Engineered Organisms and the Environment: Current Status and Recommendations, Ecological Applications 377 (Ecological Society of America, 2005).

[6] Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 7 – 10, 12, 2000.

[7] Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 10.6, 2000.

[9] Swati Singh & Upasana Rajaram, India’s Genetic Monsters (Envtl. L. & Prac. Rev., Working Paper No. 86, 2011).

[10] The Environment Protection Act, 1986, §25, No. 29, Acts of Parliament, 1986 (India).

[11] Rules for manufacture, use/import/export & storage of hazardous microorganisms/genetically engineered organisms or cells, 1989, G.S.R. 1037 (E). (India).

[14] Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Genetically Engineered Plants, 2008.

[15] Guidelines for the Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Plants, 2016; Environmental Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Plants: A Guide for Stakeholders and Risk Analysis Framework, 2016; Guidelines, User’s Guide and Risk Analysis Framework In: Environmental Risk Assessment of GE Plants 2016.

[16] Vibha Ahuja, Regulation of emerging gene technologies in India (BMC Proceedings, Working paper No. 12 (Suppl 8): 14, 2018).

[17] The Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill, 2013, PRS Legislative Research, https://prsindia.org/billtrack/the-biotechnology-regulatory-authority-of-india-bill-2013, accessed 3 October 2022.

[19] Suman Sahai, GMO Regulations in India and their Weakness, Gene Campaign, genecampaign.org/Publication/Article/gmo-reg-india-weakness-pl=ID1.htm, accessed 3 October 2022.

[20] Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, the Seed Act, 1966, the Biosecurity Regulations, the National Biodiversity Act, 2002 and the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001.

[21] Aarti Gupta, Ensuring 'Safe Use' of Biotechnology: Key Challenges 2763 (Economic and Political Weekly, 2002).

[22] Convention on Biological Diversity, Art.14(1), 1992, 1760 UNTS 79.

[23] Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Art. 23, 2000.

[24] A. Damodaran, Re-Engineering Biosafety Regulations In India: Towards a Critique of Policy, Law and Prescriptions (Environment and Development Journal, 2005).

[26] The Environment Protection Act, 1986, §15, No. 29, Acts of Parliament, 1986 (India).

[27] Alexander G. Haslberger, Monitoring and Labelling for Genetically Modfied Products, (American Association for the Advancement of Science, Working Paper No. 431, 2000).

[29] Mahim Pratap Singh, Activists Voice Concern over Biotech Regulatory Authority Bill, The Hindu (Feb. 18, 2010), http://beta.thehindu.com/news/national/article108821.ece.

[30] Suman Sahai, The BT Brinjal Case: Overhauling the Regulatory System must be the First Step, Gene Campaign, http://www.genecampaign.org/Publication/Article/GMtech/the Bt brinjal-caseoverhauling-the-regulatory-system-must-be-the-first-feb10=ID3.html, accessed 3 October 2022.

[1] Sneha Mahawar, Vanya Verma, How to take legal action against sextortion, iPleaders (June 5, 2021) at https://blog.ipleaders.in/take-legal-action-sextortion/#Section_1081ia.

[2] Sneha Mahawar, Vanya Verma, How to take legal action against sextortion, iPleaders (June 5, 2021) at https://blog.ipleaders.in/take-legal-action-sextortion/#Section_1081ia.

[3] Sneha Mahawar, Vanya Verma, How to take legal action against sextortion, iPleaders (June 5, 2021) at https://blog.ipleaders.in/take-legal-action-sextortion/#Section_1081ia.

[5] Sneha Mahawar, Vanya Verma, How to take legal action against sextortion, iPleaders (June 5, 2021) at https://blog.ipleaders.in/take-legal-action-sextortion/#Section_1081ia.

[6] Sneha Mahawar, Vanya Verma, How to take legal action against sextortion, iPleaders (June 5, 2021) at https://blog.ipleaders.in/take-legal-action-sextortion/#Section_1081ia.

[7] Sneha Mahawar, Vanya Verma, How to take legal action against sextortion, iPleaders (June 5, 2021) at https://blog.ipleaders.in/take-legal-action-sextortion/#Section_1081ia.

[11] Saloni Agrawal, Online sextortion, Indian Journal of Health, Sexuality & Culture at https://iisb.org/pdf/june2020/6.%20Online%20sextortion.pdf.

[1] Chiranjeev Gogoi, Trademark Infringement Through Keyword Advertising In India: Issues And Challenges, http://docs.manupatra.in/newsline/articles/Upload/03DB7DF0-4F52-45EA-ABFF-AC5DB67FC9D9.2-C IPR.pdf

[3] Section 29(6)(d) of Trade Marks Act, 1999

[8] Google France SARL v. Louis Vuitton Malletier SA, Case C-236/08, order dated 23-3-2010 ECLI:EU:C:2010:159

[10] Sec 2(2)(b) and (c) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

[11] King Stubb and Kasiva, Invisible Trademark Infringement: India’s Standpoint, https://ksandk.com/ipr/invisible-trademark-infringement-india/

[14] Sangita Sharma, MakeMyTrip vs Booking.com – Looking at the Delhi High Court Injunction on Usage of Adwords,https://spicyip.com/2022/05/makemytrip-vs-booking-com-looking-at-the-delhi-high-court-injunction-on-u sage-of-adwords.html

IJLRA	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE	N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)

“CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF AI AND ITS EFFECT ON IPR” BY: A YUVRAJ

‘A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF HOW MORALS INFLUENCE LAW WITH NEXUS TO THE HART FULLER DEBATE’ BY - AARYA SHRIVASTAVA & SEEMA SHRIVASTAVA

“ANALYSIS AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY IN INDIA” BY - P MAHIMA

THE NEED FOR INTRODUCING AMBULANCE LEGISLATION IN THE INDIAN LEGAL FRAMEWORK BY - ARYAN RAGHAVENDRA

PREVENTING TRANSBOUNDARY HARM - AN ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF ICJ BY: SARVESH M S & THARUN PRANAV

REGULATION OF NOVEL GENETIC ENGINEERING IN CROPS BY - ABHISVARA KANDALAM

ANALYSIS OF SEXTORTION IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM OF INDIA BY - ARAV AGARWAL

SECTION 149 AND ITS CLASH BETWEEN ARTICLE 19 BY - SHRI SUDHARSAN

KEYWORD BASED ADVERTISEMENT AND TRADEMARK PROTECTION INTRODUCTION: BY - NISHANTH GOWDA S

THE EFFECT OF TRADEMARK DILUTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ISSUES IN INDIA AND USA BY - HARINI SUNDARRAJ

LAW JOURNAL

IMPORTANT LINKS

ETHICS & POLICY

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation

Citation 2